Fatemeh Alaea Rahmani; Fereshteh Motamed Langeroudi; Farideh Amini
Abstract
Intertextuality is a theory that focuses on the necessary interconnection between the texts and studies how the texts related to each other. applying this theory in the field of Qur’an and Hadiths is effective in explaining the deep connection between Qur’an and Etrat (prophet's family). ...
Read More
Intertextuality is a theory that focuses on the necessary interconnection between the texts and studies how the texts related to each other. applying this theory in the field of Qur’an and Hadiths is effective in explaining the deep connection between Qur’an and Etrat (prophet's family). Thus, in this article, we seek to study the intertextual connection between the Holy Qur’an and Ṣaḥīfa al-Sajjādiya on the issue of evil (Satan). Applying a Descriptive-Analytic study, we aim to expand a new horizon on the interpretation of the Prayers. The knowledgeable relation between Imam Sajjad's thoughts and Holy Qur’an paves the way to compromise between the underlying text and presenting text. Like the Holy Qur’an, Ṣaḥīfa al-Sajjādiya deals with Evil's attributes and practices. most of the prayers of Ṣaḥīfa al-Sajjādiya on overcoming Evil are deeply understood only in the light of their interconnection with the Holy Qur’an. meticulously studying the prayers of Ṣaḥīfa al-Sajjādiya, we conclude that most of the intertextual connection between Holy Qur’an and the prayers are reflected in a parallel negation in which Imam Sajjad (AS) makes a compromise between the underlying and presenting text and as a result provides a knowledgeable connection with the text. relying on Qur’anic terms Imam Sajjad (AS) explains the following issues in his prayers: Satan's temptation and devious, Evil seduction, beautifying the false actions by him, overcoming Evil by the power of prayers, protecting the children from Evil through prayers, prayers protect us from being Evil companions, etc.
Soheila Jalali Kondori; Fereshteh Motamed Langarodi
Abstract
Miracles of the Quran are those of the key issues disscused by the thinkers. Abusoleiman Khataei and Abdolghaher Jorjani are considered as the leading figures of the field that have paid close attention to the miracle aspect of the Quran in terms of poetry. The present study is meant to examine Khataei ...
Read More
Miracles of the Quran are those of the key issues disscused by the thinkers. Abusoleiman Khataei and Abdolghaher Jorjani are considered as the leading figures of the field that have paid close attention to the miracle aspect of the Quran in terms of poetry. The present study is meant to examine Khataei and Jorjani s views on the miracles of the Quran based on a descriptive-analytic approach and through comparing and critiquing. Khataei holds that the nature of the Quran is in a way that if a word of it is replaced with another word, the word will lose its intended meaning or its glory, and therefore, its rhetoric will go away. On the other hand, Jorjani holds that the structure of the Quran is related to the poetic aspect of it. He believes that the poetic aspect can be understood through the structural meanings, and this understanding is possible through a nice selection. He also believes that a word in the poetry is a function of semantic. Moreover, the relation between the words, unlike structural relations, does not lead to poetry, yet it is the order of the meaning and their structures in the mind of the speaker that makes poetry. Both Khataei and Jorjani accept the effect of the miracle of the Quran, but they see its uniqueness in its poetry. Considering these two thinkers’ ideas, we can understand that Khataei’s approach in Albayan is rhetoric, but that of Jorjani in Dalaelolejaz is structural and rhetoric as well as artistic. In fact, Jorjani has perfected the poetic thought in a way that, at present, many consider it as the most important aspect of the miracle.
fathiye fatahizadeh; fereshteh motamed langerody
Volume 7, Issue 22 , April 2016, , Pages 95-132
Abstract
Intertextuality is a theory that examines how the texts are related and how they interact with each other, which brings about the creation of a new text. According to this theory, any text is a new context of changed quotations. Intertextual relation is a useful tool for the audience to read a text. ...
Read More
Intertextuality is a theory that examines how the texts are related and how they interact with each other, which brings about the creation of a new text. According to this theory, any text is a new context of changed quotations. Intertextual relation is a useful tool for the audience to read a text. According to this theory, Fadak sermon of Hazrat Zahra (as a speaking Quran) and the silent Quran have been studied from two levels: superstructure and infrastructure. It seems that Hazrat Zahra (SA)‘s conscious interaction with the Quran has made the compatibility and harmony between the hidden text and present text. Hence, in many cases, it is not possible to have a deep understanding of Fadak sermon, except in light of its qualitative relationship with the Quran. Therefore, this study investigates the intertextual relations between her sermons and the Holy Quran in order to open up new horizons about her sermons. The method used in this article is analytical documentary. The results of the study indicate that the most frequent Intertextual relations between Fadak sermon and the Quran are structural, in the form of the parallel negation, in which she (Pbuh) has been able to create a strong compatibility among her remarks and hidden text and make a conscious interaction.
