amanolah naseri karimvand; ghasem bostani; hamzeh obaydi neysi
Abstract
Paying attention to the correct meanings of the words of the Quran plays an important role in interpreting and understanding the meaning of God Almighty. Hence, the meanings of words are considered as one of the important keywords of every commentator in understanding the divine word, based on which, ...
Read More
Paying attention to the correct meanings of the words of the Quran plays an important role in interpreting and understanding the meaning of God Almighty. Hence, the meanings of words are considered as one of the important keywords of every commentator in understanding the divine word, based on which, his interpretation has a special direction and may be influential in the works of later commentators. One of these commentators is Zamakhshari, who in his commentary (Kashaf) has chosen special meanings for some words that have been criticized by other commentators such as Allameh Tabatabai. In this research, the question has been answered that what words did Allameh Tabataba'i criticize in Keshaf's commentary and what is the validity of his criticisms? This article, by descriptive-analytical method and library method, while collecting these words and mentioning the meanings of Zamakhshari and Tabatabai's critique, also examines the accuracy of these meanings and the critiques made in order to find out which meanings; The meanings of Zamakhshari or Allameh Tabatabai are correct. The result of the research is that although the critical opinions of the author of al-Mizan are often correct, in some cases, Zamakhshari's point of view is valid and preferable, and Tabatabai's criticism does not apply to it.
amanalah naserikarimvand; ghasem bostani
Abstract
Citing narrations is one of the authentic sources for the commentator. But commentators have taken different views and practices of how to use this source, and each one has some kind of narration that many of them have slipped into this field. Allameh Tabataba'i, by presenting "narrative discussions" ...
Read More
Citing narrations is one of the authentic sources for the commentator. But commentators have taken different views and practices of how to use this source, and each one has some kind of narration that many of them have slipped into this field. Allameh Tabataba'i, by presenting "narrative discussions" in the interpretation of al-Mizan, seeks to assess the validity and reliability of interpretative narrations as well as to criticize the commentators' views on the use of this legacy and he examines applying the foundations and criteria of Fighh Al-Hadith in detail for the investigation and Ijtihad criticism of commentators in the use of narrations, and cases of misunderstanding, inadequate ijtihad, and weaknesses in interpretative narratives by stating documented and reasoned reasons. Of course, Allameh's evaluations of criticism of narrations and commentators' opinions have also been judged and their validity discovered and the strengths and weaknesses of his views are expressed..
seyyed yousef mahfozi; ghasem bostani; nasre baji
Abstract
Imams Baqir (AS) are the true interpreters of the holy Qur'an, and whatever they interpret about the Qur'an are the exact words of the Qur'an because they are the true walking Qur'an, and they have received the science of interpretation of the Qur'an from Prophet Mohammad (Pbuh). Since those noble Imams ...
Read More
Imams Baqir (AS) are the true interpreters of the holy Qur'an, and whatever they interpret about the Qur'an are the exact words of the Qur'an because they are the true walking Qur'an, and they have received the science of interpretation of the Qur'an from Prophet Mohammad (Pbuh). Since those noble Imams after Prophet Mohammad (Pbuh) are the most knowledgeable and the wisest people to the knowledge of Qur'an, in this study we have decided to deal with the traditions of Imam Baqir (AS) about this field of science. The current paper has examined the typology and interpretation methods of Imam Baqir (AS) and concludes that the Imam in his speeches, depending on the capabilities and the atmosphere of the society, has explained the knowledge of the Qur'an in several ways including: Qur'anic sciences, the interpretation of the Qur'an with the Qur'an, the interpretation of the Qur'an with Sunnah, Jerry and matching, the explanation of Qur'anic parables, the appearance and reality of the Qur'an, the dispelling of doubts, the referential expression of Qur'anic verses and educational dimensions etc.
