Ali Sharifi; Zahra Bakhtiari
Abstract
The present study uses a descriptive method and library studies to compare the views of Imam Musa Sadr and Sheikh Mohammed Abduh as examples of Shi'ite and neo-Muʿtazila wisdom, the position of "reason" is clear in their view and attempts to show that their rational reasoning in the commentary of the ...
Read More
The present study uses a descriptive method and library studies to compare the views of Imam Musa Sadr and Sheikh Mohammed Abduh as examples of Shi'ite and neo-Muʿtazila wisdom, the position of "reason" is clear in their view and attempts to show that their rational reasoning in the commentary of the Qur'an emphasizing social issues by referring to examples of Quranic verses. The main question of the research is this: What is the common stance of Imam Musa Sadr and Sheikh Muhammad Abduh about "reason" and its place in interpretation? In response to this question, it emphasizes the validity of reason as one of the documents of rational interpretation. Finally, by examining the opinions of these two people, we conclude that both are in agreement on the possibility of understanding and permission to interpret the Qur'an for all human beings. Also, both believe in the validity of reason in the interpretation of the Qur'an. In the end, both have used enough of reason in the interpretation of the Quran as a power of understanding axioms, expressing and explaining theoretical propositions and interpreting some of the appearances of the Qur'an.
ali karbalaei pazoki; seyyed sadraldin taheri
Abstract
Based on the Qur'an, Man is the best creature of God. That is why Qur'an refers to him a lot, and some judgments have been made about man and his deeds. Given the importance of anthropological value and its impact on human behavior, in this article we have classified the Qur'anic judgments into two groups: ...
Read More
Based on the Qur'an, Man is the best creature of God. That is why Qur'an refers to him a lot, and some judgments have been made about man and his deeds. Given the importance of anthropological value and its impact on human behavior, in this article we have classified the Qur'anic judgments into two groups: condemnatory and complimentary features. Furthermore, these features have been briefly analyzed based on some contemporary and earlier interpretations of Sunnis and Shiites. It is important to know in what ways man in the Qur'an seems to be worthy of praise or condemnation, and to know what proportion exists between them based on the quantitative and qualitative assessment and which one is more fundamental. The main question in this case is what is the dual philosophy of the Qur'anic descriptions about man? This study is a library-based, descriptive, and hermeneutics with a theoretical approach which tries to seek the answers to the questions based on the Qur'an. It is suggested that all the instincts and attributes that the human nature are composed of, either positive and negative, pave the way for his excellence and perfection, and are necessary for the human growth. Moreover, if some human features are criticized in some verses of the Qur'an, It is because of the fact that man has misused or overused them or even the criticism is relative. That is to say man is attributed a condemnatory feature when he is compared with some creatures or divine greatness. Therefore, the reason of dual descriptions of man in the Qur'an becomes clear and the superficial contradiction between the verses of praising and blaming disappears.
