Ali Hasanbeigi
Abstract
Methodical understanding of hadith" depends on the application of "rules of understanding". On the other hand, simply applying the rules of understanding does not lead to the realization of methodical understanding, but it is also necessary to pay attention to the disadvantages of understanding. Ignoring ...
Read More
Methodical understanding of hadith" depends on the application of "rules of understanding". On the other hand, simply applying the rules of understanding does not lead to the realization of methodical understanding, but it is also necessary to pay attention to the disadvantages of understanding. Ignoring the harms of understanding disrupts the methodical understanding of the hadith, and it takes the researcher away from the speaker's main intention. One of the disadvantages of understanding hadith is neglecting the source of hadith. The following article seeks to calculate the consequences of neglecting the source of hadith. With the effort that was made, it became clear that so far no writing has been published about the contexts and consequences of neglecting the source of hadith. This research, which was carried out with a descriptive-analytical method, has come to the conclusion that according to the mentioned method, The grounds of neglecting the source of Hadith are: miswriting, distortion, fragmentation, illusion of the narrator, substitution and synonymy. Also, the consequences of not paying attention to the sources of hadith include: perception of conflict between hadith, incorrect understanding of hadith, creation of problems in hadith, perception of meaninglessness of hadith and generalization.
Norouz Amini; mahbubeh rezaniya
Abstract
The first interpreter of the Qur'an, according to the Qur'an explicitly, is the Prophet. After the Prophet, with the presence of the elders of the Companions, as the first interpretive references of that time, developed in the major cities of that era, such as Mecca, Medina, Kufa, and Basra, the geography ...
Read More
The first interpreter of the Qur'an, according to the Qur'an explicitly, is the Prophet. After the Prophet, with the presence of the elders of the Companions, as the first interpretive references of that time, developed in the major cities of that era, such as Mecca, Medina, Kufa, and Basra, the geography of its interpretation and its subjects, and the learned scholars in each of these centers stepped up. They were firmly committed to the development of commentary. However, the development of the geography of interpretation has not always benefited from this knowledge, and in some cases, for several reasons, has caused some damage to the interpretation. This essay examines Basra's interpretive school in this regard and seeks out the most significant damage and deviations of Basra's interpretation by presenting a detailed picture of Basra's interpretative field. The findings indicate that Basra's interpretation of the interpretive, the Muʿtazila, the flow of Ahl al-Hadith, and Ahl al-Ra'y has been heavily influenced by the currents of the Qur'an, and therefore several of these injuries have affected the interpretation of Basra.
