amanalah naserikarimvand; ghasem bostani
Abstract
Citing narrations is one of the authentic sources for the commentator. But commentators have taken different views and practices of how to use this source, and each one has some kind of narration that many of them have slipped into this field. Allameh Tabataba'i, by presenting "narrative discussions" ...
Read More
Citing narrations is one of the authentic sources for the commentator. But commentators have taken different views and practices of how to use this source, and each one has some kind of narration that many of them have slipped into this field. Allameh Tabataba'i, by presenting "narrative discussions" in the interpretation of al-Mizan, seeks to assess the validity and reliability of interpretative narrations as well as to criticize the commentators' views on the use of this legacy and he examines applying the foundations and criteria of Fighh Al-Hadith in detail for the investigation and Ijtihad criticism of commentators in the use of narrations, and cases of misunderstanding, inadequate ijtihad, and weaknesses in interpretative narratives by stating documented and reasoned reasons. Of course, Allameh's evaluations of criticism of narrations and commentators' opinions have also been judged and their validity discovered and the strengths and weaknesses of his views are expressed..
