amanolah naseri karimvand; ghasem bostani; hamzeh obaydi neysi
Abstract
Paying attention to the correct meanings of the words of the Quran plays an important role in interpreting and understanding the meaning of God Almighty. Hence, the meanings of words are considered as one of the important keywords of every commentator in understanding the divine word, based on which, ...
Read More
Paying attention to the correct meanings of the words of the Quran plays an important role in interpreting and understanding the meaning of God Almighty. Hence, the meanings of words are considered as one of the important keywords of every commentator in understanding the divine word, based on which, his interpretation has a special direction and may be influential in the works of later commentators. One of these commentators is Zamakhshari, who in his commentary (Kashaf) has chosen special meanings for some words that have been criticized by other commentators such as Allameh Tabatabai. In this research, the question has been answered that what words did Allameh Tabataba'i criticize in Keshaf's commentary and what is the validity of his criticisms? This article, by descriptive-analytical method and library method, while collecting these words and mentioning the meanings of Zamakhshari and Tabatabai's critique, also examines the accuracy of these meanings and the critiques made in order to find out which meanings; The meanings of Zamakhshari or Allameh Tabatabai are correct. The result of the research is that although the critical opinions of the author of al-Mizan are often correct, in some cases, Zamakhshari's point of view is valid and preferable, and Tabatabai's criticism does not apply to it.
mohammad taqi shaker; mohammad taqi shaker
Abstract
Abstract The main issue of this research is the analysis of the nature and quality of man's evolution in divine revelations according to the reading, wisdom and the structure of author's thought of “al-Mizan’’. Also, There is an explanation of Questions about this problem on the basis ...
Read More
Abstract The main issue of this research is the analysis of the nature and quality of man's evolution in divine revelations according to the reading, wisdom and the structure of author's thought of “al-Mizan’’. Also, There is an explanation of Questions about this problem on the basis of on the views of Allameh Tabatabai. This article has been written based on library data with descriptive- analytical method. The result of this research isachieving three main views about human evolution, namely the physical evolution, mental evolution and the evolution human's Frontend and backend. In the reading of the author of al-Mizan, beside os realization of spiritual degradation(moral or ethical metamorphosis), there is a physical evolution (genetic changes) which it is after this stage. With regard to the idea that their humanity has not disappeared completely and final, Allameh has said that it is possible the continuation of thisruleinothernations and we can found the basis of his speechin the influence of spirit on the body from his look.
moslem simorghi zonouzi; samad abdollahi abed
Volume 3, Issue 6 , April 2012, , Pages 121-144
Abstract
The corporeal afterlife and belief in it is one of the important requirements of Islam; so much so that the disbelief in it is equal to profanity. Various views have been held by Islamic scholars on the quality of the afterlife. The subject has been looked into theologically by theologians, philosophically ...
Read More
The corporeal afterlife and belief in it is one of the important requirements of Islam; so much so that the disbelief in it is equal to profanity. Various views have been held by Islamic scholars on the quality of the afterlife. The subject has been looked into theologically by theologians, philosophically by philosophers, and with focus on hadith by hadith scholars. This paper seeks to examine viewpoints of two of the great Islamic exegetists of the Qur’an in Shia and Sunni traditions, AllamehTabatab’i and Alousi respectively, by analyzing in their respective books, al-Mizan and Ruh al-Ma‘ani, their exegeses of the verses which imply the corporeal afterlife. Alousi adopts a theological approach arguing that, in the afterlife, the human being will be the same as what he was in the world after his scattered pieces converge together. Allameh Tabataba’i, however, adopts a philosophical approach and argues that what happens in the afterlife is conversion not convergence, and that the sameness is in the soul not the body – which will not be the same as that of the world, but similar to it.