Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 IlamUnversity
2 Ilamunversity
Abstract
Negation of badness is one of the most used expressions in narrative sources. The famous Imamiyyah jurists have considered the concept of the negation of evil to be permissible and the negation of prohibition in the assumption of exclusion from evidence, and they have listed the proof of evil as the absolute benefit of abhorrence and the meaning of both prohibition and abhorrence. Analyzing the concept of "badness" and "accuracy" in the Qur'anic applications and its narration shows that the use of this lexical item in the field of legislation is proportional to the concept of punishment and eagle, and according to this proportionality, a new approach should be adopted regarding this concept. It seems that the meaning of negation of evil is the negation of sanctions and its proof is proof of sanctions, and the implication of proving corruption is dependent on accepting the implication of corruption from sanctions. In other words, the proof of evil does not imply corruption, and the use of corruption is dependent on the acceptance of prohibition and corruption, which the famous scholars of Usul accepted in worship and refused to accept in transactions.
Keywords
Main Subjects
)